Q • Complete labs from Chapters 16, 19, and 20 from your Digital Forensics Workbook. • Directions for the labs can be found when accessing the manual. • Download the lab work files, if needed. • Ensure that you take screenshots of all completed tasks. • Place text files and screenshots within a compressed folder and submit. Rubric Lab Assignment Rubric Lab Assignment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of the evidence and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). 17 to >12.0 pts Satisfactory Presents a thorough analysis of the evidence and demonstrates an understanding a somewhat acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issues(s). 12 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Does not present an analysis of the evidence or demonstrate an understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProcedure/Data 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Procedures are listed in a clear, logical order. Each step is numbered and is in a complete sentence. Accurate representation of the data is evident in tables and/or graphs. Charts, graphs, and tables are clearly labeled and accurately titled. 17 to >12.0 pts Satisfactory Procedures are listed in a logical order. Fair representation of the data is evident in tables and/or graphs. Charts, graphs, and tables are labeled and/or titled. 12 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Procedures do not accurately list the steps of the investigation. Data is not shown or is inaccurate. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the analysis and the technical concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates complete understanding of the technical concepts and the forensic investigative tools studied. Supports conclusions and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective. 17 to >12.0 pts Satisfactory Makes appropriate connections between the forensic analysis and the technical concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates good command of the concepts and forensic and investigative tools studied. Supports forensic conclusions and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective. 12 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Makes no connection between the forensic analysis and the technical concepts studied in the reading. Does not Support analysis conclusions and opinions with reasons and evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading. 17 to >12.0 pts Satisfactory Presents realistic or appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading. 12 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Does not present realistic or appropriate recommendations and offers no support from the information presented and concepts from the reading. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized. Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources. 17 to >12.0 pts Satisfactory Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized. Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources. 12 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Writing is extremely unfocused, rambling, or contains major errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; extremely disorganized. Does not use APA guidelines, if applicable. 20 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext